Here are some highlights from the government's latest brief opposing a Dr. Cyril Wecht's motion for dismissal of the indictment against him. This brief responds to the the defense claims of misconduct by the prosecution. In the conclusion, the government again hints that it may seek a jury from outside the Pittsburgh area for the second trial.
It begins with this:
There is a risk for those who have been subjected to the full extent of Wecht's ongoing campaign of obfuscation, misdirection, half-truth, misstatement and outright falsehood -- a risk of becoming numb to the repeated false assertions or, worse yet, ceasing to be vigilant in the face of the relentlessly dishonest onslaught. However, the government will labor, yet again, to correct the record that Wecht's truthless motion would otherwise distort beyond recognition.
...contains these comments:
...Wecht's accusations are not only false, but knowingly so......Yet sensational accusations like these make good copy, regardless of their truth........On what basis do Wecht's lawyers, as officers of the Court, level this serious accusation of prosecutorial misconduct? No basis whatsoever. Wecht and his lawyers have made it out of whole cloth. It is a fabrication, nothing more.....Wecht's accusation...is based entirely upon lies.....I. Wecht's Entire Motion is Based Upon Falsehoods.......The argument is based upon several outright fallacies.......II. Wecht's Eight Other False Accusations of Prosecutorial Misconduct.......The lack of truth in these accusations is apparent to anyone familiar with these proceedings. One is left to wonder, yet again, for whose benefit is Wecht writing?...
...and ends with this:
ConclusionPerhaps nothing can preserve the public's right to a fair trial in this division of the Western District of Pennsylvania, in light of Wecht's relentless campaign of publicity and slander by false court filings. Yet this latest motion hits new lows -- including repulsive allegations of anti-Semitism, utterly false allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, and other baseless ad hominem attacks -- and should be denied.
Mary Beth BuchananUnited States Attorneyby: s/Stephen S. StallingsAssistant U.S. Attorney
.
No comments:
Post a Comment