Showing posts with label TV Reports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TV Reports. Show all posts

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Parents' Lawsuit Over Pittsburgh Soldier's Death


Defense contractor KBR is asking a local federal judge to toss out a wrongful death lawsuit by the parents of a Pittsburgh area solider electrocuted in Iraq.

Green Beret Staff Sergeant Ryan Maseth was electrocuted while taking a shower at a base in Iraq. His parents want to know what KBR and the government knew -- and when -- about electrocution dangers from the wiring at his base in Baghdad. They also want to know if Maseth's death was preventable.

In its motion, KBR argues that the Maseth's case:

"raises inherently political questions involving... military policy level and tactical decision making ... and the direction the military provided to KBR regarding needed repair work."


KBR's filing also cites the:

"combatant activities exemption" which "shields the U.S. government" and "...has also been interpreted to protect the military's defense contractors, like KBR".


When informed of KBR's motion, Congressman Jason Altmire told me:

"I think to argue that you should as a contractor have the right to ignore a known problem and suffer no consequences as a result when your inaction causes death is a pretty faulty argument. And to say that contractors should have some sort of exemption away from this type of activity i think is ludicrous."



Here's a Pittsburgh Channel link to my Channel 4 Action News story that aired on Memorial Day.


Since my story aired, CNN's investigative unit has reported that it's obtained documents dealing with the electrical problems that led to his death.


CNN reports the following on its website:

"....Army documents obtained by CNN show that U.S.-paid contractor Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) inspected the building and found serious electrical problems a full 11 months before Maseth was electrocuted. "

"KBR noted 'several safety issues concerning the improper grounding of electrical devices.' But KBR's contract did not cover 'fixing potential hazards.' It covered repairing items only after they broke down. "

"Only after Maseth died did the Army issue an emergency order for KBR to finally fix the electrical problems, and that order was carried out soon thereafter."


Here's a link to CNN's online video.


In April, U.S. Senator Bob Casey called for a GAO Investigation into Electrocution-Related Deaths in Iraq.


Here are two New York Times stories on the controversy...

Despite Alert, Flawed Wiring Still Kills G.I.’s - New York Times


G.I.’s Death Prompts 2 Inquiries of Iraq Electrocutions - New York Times


...and an article from Editor and Publisher.


KBR has said that it was providing repair services at the facility in response to Army requests at the time of Ryan Maseth's death. The company's spokesperson e-mailed this statement to me:

"KBR's top priority is the safety and security of its employees and the customers the company serves."

"Our thoughts and prayers remain with Staff Sgt. Maseth's family."



.

Read More...

Saturday, May 24, 2008

"Your Move" E-Mails Chatter


There's a lively discussion of the "Your Move" E-mails over on the Burgh Report.


Here's what I posted there in answer to some readers' questions about the authenticity of the e-mails and the positions of various council members.


The e-mails were not obtained from anyone who hacked into the city's or the Penguins' servers; that is to say, they came from a participant in the electronic conversation. The mayor's chief of staff confirmed the authenticity of the e-mails when I reviewed their contents with him by phone. That said, confirming that the e-mails were authentic doesn't mean that any one or all of the authors' e-mails are gospel. The authors are speaking their understanding of the facts, the law and of other parties' positions. They be correct or incorrect in their understanding on any given point.

When I interviewed Councilman Dowd on Wednesday, he told me that the first he heard about the banners was in a phone call from the mayor's chief of staff around eight Friday night, asking if he would support them. Dowd told me his response was to request more information--that he wasn't able to take a position either way without learning more. Dowd's quote didn't make it into the news that day because the focus was on trying to learn who was opposed, not who was neutral.

On that same Wednesday:
Councilman Kraus said that he had not taken a position on the banners and
Councilman Burgess said he was in support of finding a way to put them up.

Also on Wednesday:
Councilman Motznik said he supported putting up the banners, but insisted the mayor's office had never informed him of the proposal.
Councilman Deasy said he was in support of the banners.
I did not have the opportunity to ask Councilwomen Harris or Payne their positions.


In response to the comment by Anonymous 05/24/08 12:49 pm on the Burgh Report:
I never heard Mayor Ravenstahl say that "there was only one councilman who had issues".
On Wednesday said there were "a couple". On that same day, Councilmen Shields and Peduto said they were not opposed to putting the banners, and said they told the administration they would cooperate in supporting a way to do so legally.

On Thursday, the Mayor reaffirmed his claim that there were council members opposed to putting up the banners. He also said that he believed the public remarks by the council members on Wednesday showed that they were opposed. In that Thursday interview, for the first time I heard the mayor say that he wanted support from council to have been "unanimous". Also, for the first time he said that council would have had to repeal the moratorium on new billboards in Pittsburgh. A repeal of the moratorium was not discussed in the e-mails.

Moments later, other reporters and I sought responses from Shields and Peduto. They reaffirmed they hadn't opposed putting up the banners--and said they had recommended ways to do so in a meeting late Monday afternoon with members of the Ravenstahl administration.


.

Read More...

Friday, May 23, 2008

Penguins Banners Bonus Feature

Simulation by WTAE Channel 4 Action News Artist

C
lick here for the "Penguins Banners? The 'Your Move' E-Mails" post.
If you'd like to read the entire sequence of e-mails on which the story is based, click the "Read More..." link below.

I've removed the e-mail addresses of participants and added a few annotations. The following sequence was reconstructed from many separate e-mail exchanges, then placed in chronological order. The source material was in the reverse-order that's common in ongoing e-mail conversations. Typos from the e-mails have been left as is. Some of those taking part were apparently thumb-typing on their BlackBerries, which tends to result in more typing errors.

Again, if you're interested, click the "Read More..." link in the left hand corner, below.
.



-----Original Message-----

From: Ismail, Noor

To: Tymoczko, Susan

CC: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Fri May 16 14:01:35 2008

Subject: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena


Susan,


I will follow this e-mail up with a call. A quick question for you. Penguins want to put up massive banners/signs for the arena to coincide with the games. The banners/signs may be equivalent to the Cleveland Stadium of LeBron James - it may depict a sponsor(s) such as Reebok, Nike etc.


Please call Ross Johnson at [----] and find out more about what they proposed to do - I am uncertain again whether this is temporary or permanent. Please walk them through the process, if possible. Time is of the essence for them given the pending games - and they would be interested to know what would be the fastest and quickest way to get this done. Keep both Yarone and me posted on the outcome. Thank you.


Noor Ismail, AICP


Director
Department of City Planning
City of Pittsburgh




-----Original Message-----

From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 2:05 PM

To: Ismail, Noor; Tymoczko, Susan; [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]
Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Thank you very much. These will be temporary and his name is Ross Johnson, not Miller as I previously stated.





-----Original Message-----

From: Tymoczko, Susan
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 3:18 PM

To: Zober, Yarone; Ismail, Noor; David Morehouse

Cc: Ross Miller

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



I've spoken with Ross Miller. The current proposal is for two, 40 ft. x 100 ft. banners on private property each showing a player with a corporate logo as well; each to be located on a downtown building. I've requested to see a copy of the artwork; for the permit application we will also require the exact street address and a letter from the property owner authorizing the application. We have no provision in the Zoning Code for temporary signs of this type, and in the past we have sent similar proposals to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Once I see the artwork I can make a determination on the type of permit that will be required.



Susan




-----Original Message-----

From: Ross Miller [Pittsburgh Penguins]

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 4:19 PM

To: Tymoczko, Susan; Zober, Yarone; Ismail, Noor; David Morehouse

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Please find the banner images attached. The final size of each will be 40ft wide x 85ft high. The images will be printed on Ultra Flex Ultra Mesh Lightweight Supreme material. I am in the process of obtaining a swatch now and will share with the property owners as well as the city.



It is a perforated material that will allow light in and tenants can see out from inside the building. The installer has experience working with this material.



I have spoken with the property owner of PPG Place and we are doing a site inspection on Monday morning with the installer. They will provide an authorization letter and I will obtain the other necessities at that time.



Still waiting to hear back from Fifth Ave. Place...will keep everyone posted.



Ross Miller

Pittsburgh Penguins






From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 4:26 PM

To: Shields, Doug

Subject: Fw: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



As per our discussions. This may be happening, with proper approvals and process. Will need your help.





-----Original Message-----

From: Tymoczko, Susan

To: 'Ross Miller'; Zober, Yarone; Ismail, Noor; David Morehouse

CC: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence

Sent: Fri May 16 17:27:31 2008

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Reviewing the proposed artwork and given the amount of advertising copy included, I cannot say that these are approvable. There is presently a moratorium in place that prohibits approval of new advertising signage; given this circumstance I would suggest consideration of revision to the proposed artwork. I've just spoken with Ross and David, and they are proceeding with some changes.



Susan



----- Original Message -----

From: Zober, Yarone

To: Tymoczko, Susan ; Ross Miller; Ismail, Noor ; David Morehouse

Cc: Specter, George ; Baumiller, Lawrence ; Shields, Doug

Sent: Fri May 16 17:42:23 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



If the moratorium is the greatest of the concerns, I would repectfully ask Council to lift the moratorium with respect to these festive banners. I have spoken with President Shields about this and he seemed to be in general support, though he should be contacted to dicsuss their concerns.



From: Tymoczko, Susan

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 6:12 PM

To: Zober, Yarone;
Ross Miller [Pittsburgh Penguins]; Ismail, Noor; [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]

Cc: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Just a reminder, in addition to the moratorium issue, new advertising signage is presently not permitted downtown. I'd like to be able to see what's going to be proposed.



Susan





-----Original Message-----

From: David Morehouse

To: Zober, Yarone; Tymoczko, Susan; Ross Miller ; Ismail, Noor

CC: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug

Sent: Fri May 16 18:34:33 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Just heard from Reebok and they said they are pulling out and the substantial investment from them is not worth it without their copy and that with the short window, they can't afford bureaucratic processes.



This is a shame and I can't believe we can't make this work.



I am very frustrated with this process.


----- Original Message -----

From: Zober, Yarone

To: David Morehouse; Tymoczko, Susan ; Ross Miller; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George ; Baumiller, Lawrence ; Shields, Doug
Sent: Fri May 16 18:54:07 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Just spoke to Council Pres Shields. If we can come up with a collective quick solution, we will have all the support we need from both branches of City government and nobody will be caught up in a sign-gate.



-----Original Message-----

From: David Morehouse

To: Zober, Yarone; Tymoczko, Susan; Ross Miller; Ismail, Noor

CC: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug

Sent: Fri May 16 18:59:36 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



What is the solution?



-----Original Message-----

From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:04 PM

To: [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Tymoczko, Susan;
Ross Miller [Pittsburgh Penguins]; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Here it goes:



We need the law department to agree that by introducing an ordinance, zoning can rely on the introduction as law,



We need a majority of council (which we would have with pres Shields on board) to provide support for the ordinance as soon as tonight so that the sign can be manufactured,



We need an ordinance that effectively says: for the 2008 stanley cup playoffs, the following signs shall be approved.



If Law and Council ok this process, everyone should be on good solid ground to say that pens can proceed with production for installation when?



Need shields and law to sign on now.



-----Original Message-----

From: Tymoczko, Susan

To: Zober, Yarone; [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins] ;
Ross Miller [Pittsburgh Penguins] ; Ismail, Noor

CC: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug

Sent: Fri May 16 19:15:07 2008

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Would it be possible to do an ordinance that exempts these particular signs from zoning approval? They would still need to get building permits for the installation.






-----Original Message-----

From: Shields, Doug

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:17 PM

To: Tymoczko, Susan

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Why not do this relevant to the sites.IIe stadium areas. Also couched in terms of "temporay" banners.





-----Original Message-----

From: Shields, Doug

To: [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins] ; Zober, Yarone; Tymoczko, Susan;
Ross Miller [Pittsburgh Penguins] ; Ismail, Noor

CC: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence

Sent: Fri May 16 19:18:16 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



I think instead of zoning maybe we go with temporay banners.



From: Tymoczko, Susan

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:21 PM

To: Shields, Doug

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Do you mean, these signs are to be permitted around the sports stadiums? These are to go on other buildings downtown. Larry Baumiller will call you.






-----Original Message-----

From: Shields, Doug

Sent: Fri 5/16/2008 7:22 PM

To: [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Zober, Yarone; Tymoczko, Susan; 'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



I tink zoning is not going to get this done due to time associated from moving zoning law



What have we in the code on banners? We give permits for all sorts of banners. They a re for the most part non profits but we can amend to allow for our sports teams. The city has an equity stake in all of them that's for sure



This is on the books and can be amended more readily than zone changes. Susan?



From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:23 PM

To: Shields, Doug; [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Tymoczko, Susan;

'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Whatever works for you and at least four of your colleagues works for us. Susan and Larry have both indicated their approval if Council is on board.





From: Baumiller, Lawrence

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:23 PM

To: Shields, Doug; [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Zober, Yarone;

Tymoczko, Susan; 'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



I think that Yarone and I have worked this out. What we can do is propose an amendment to the Zoning Code on Tuesday allowing "large temporary banners for regional events" and exempt them from the current sign moratorium. Since the signs are temporary, we can refrain from placing sign limitations on the banners.



This legislation will take effect immediately because of the pending ordinance doctrine associated with Zoning Code Amendments. I am on board as long as City Council agrees to pull the legislation after the Stanley Cup finals are over. That way, we won't have any lingering issues.



My cell number is [----] if you have any questions.



Thanks,

Larry



From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:25 PM

To: Shields, Doug

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Larry has also cited the fact that it can move ahead if council introduces legislation under the pending legislation doctrine- once introduced, it has the force of law. By the time for final vote, the issue will be moot and the legislation can be tabled.


From: Tymoczko, Susan

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:27 PM

To: Shields, Doug; [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Zober, Yarone;

'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George; Baumiller, Lawrence

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



A lot of the banners are in the rights-of-way and therefore not subject to zoning - there are separate rules for them, not in our code. Longer term, we should probably get something into the zoning code that addresses temporary banners with sponsorship.


From: Ismail, Noor

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:29 PM

To: Shields, Doug

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



This has advertisement Ûn it and advertising signs are prohibited downtown. Susan and Larry were trying to work this out but the sponsors would not agree to this. Again the moratorium adds another layer to this. Susan is Ûn board if there is a way to address this legally


-----Original Message-----

From: Tymoczko, Susan

Sent: Fri 5/16/2008 7:30 PM

To: Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug; [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Zober, Yarone; 'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



I think it sounds like the best solution.



Susan




From: Baumiller, Lawrence

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:32 PM

To: Tymoczko, Susan; Shields, Doug; [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins];

Zober, Yarone; 'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Actually, we could probably put a 30 day sunset provision in the legislation.







----- Original Message -----

From: Zober, Yarone
To: Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug ; David Morehouse; Tymoczko, Susan ; Ross Miller; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Sent: Fri May 16 19:32:58 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



With Pres' support, we can make this happen. A penguins nation turns its lonely eyes to you. Woo hoo hoo. What say the Pres?









-----Original Message-----

From: David Morehouse

To: Zober, Yarone; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug; Tymoczko, Susan; Ross Miller; Ismail, Noor

CC: Specter, George

Sent: Fri May 16 19:35:35 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Yes. So now I can call them and tell them it's a go?




From: Baumiller, Lawrence

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:36 PM

To: [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Zober, Yarone; Shields, Doug;

Tymoczko, Susan; 'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Let's wait for a yes from Shields.



Lawrence H. Baumiller

Assistant City Solicitor



Sent via BlackBerry




----- Original Message -----

From: Zober, Yarone

To: David Morehouse; Baumiller, Lawrence ; Shields, Doug ; Tymoczko, Susan ; Ross Miller; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Sent: Fri May 16 19:41:38 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



The other prez- Council prez...




From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:43 PM

To: Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug; Tymoczko, Susan; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Just spoke to Dowd who raised "issues". If we have Pres Shields in Pittsburgh's corner, then we can do this. If not, we can't.





-----Original Message-----

From: David Morehouse

To: Zober, Yarone; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug; Tymoczko, Susan; Ross Miller; Ismail, Noor

CC: Specter, George

Sent: Fri May 16 20:47:49 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Any confirmation yet? Printer is on hold and reebok is waiting.


From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:00 PM

To: [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields,

Doug; Tymoczko, Susan; rmiller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



President Shields' phone cut out. Still awaiting final answer.



From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:44 PM

To: [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields,

Doug; Tymoczko, Susan; 'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Lost Doug Shields. Can't proceed without knowing that he is giving go ahead.





-----Original Message-----

From: Zober, Yarone

To: [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins] ; Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug; Tymoczko, Susan; 'miller' ; Ismail, Noor

CC: Specter, George

Sent: Fri May 16 21:59:32 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Its a go from Council Prez Shields. He will confirm by email in next ten minutes. Good work everyone.




----- Original Message -----

From: Shields, Doug

To: Zober, Yarone ; David Morehouse; Baumiller, Lawrence ; Tymoczko, Susan ; Ross Miller; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Sent: Fri May 16 22:00:40 2008

Subject: [SPAM] Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



To confirm mr zober. Yes we wil find a way



From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:01 PM

To: Baumiller, Lawrence; Shields, Doug; Tymoczko, Susan; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



All right! Now we have to get an ordinance drafted ASAP. Larry or Susan- when can we get this done and what percent of banner is ad space?





From: Baumiller, Lawrence

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:01 PM

To: Zober, Yarone; [David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Shields, Doug;

Tymoczko, Susan; 'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Very good.



Lawrence H. Baumiller

Assistant City Solicitor



Sent via BlackBerry


From: David Morehouse

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:10 PM

To: Shields, Doug; Zober, Yarone; Baumiller, Lawrence; Tymoczko, Susan;

Ross Miller; Ismail, Noor

Cc: Specter, George

Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Great! Now all we have to do is beat Philly. I'll tell Rebok it's a go and on behalf of Penguins fans, I thank all of you. If we are fortunate enough to make the finals, I think this will make pgh look great.




-----Original Message-----

From: Tymoczko, Susan

To: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Fri May 16 22:22:36 2008

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



They estimated that it was about 2.5 percent, for the reebock only.





From: Zober, Yarone

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:23 PM

To: Tymoczko, Susan; Shields, Doug

Subject: Re: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



Great.


[Reporters note: the next e-mail is in response to the earlier Friday, May 16, 7:32 PM message suggesting a 30 day sunset provision in the legislation.]

From: Specter, George

Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 11:00 AM

To: Baumiller, Lawrence; Tymoczko, Susan; Shields, Doug;

[David Morehouse, Pittsburgh Penguins]; Zober, Yarone;

'miller'; Ismail, Noor

Subject: RE: Banners/Signs Question - for the Arena



That is too long. It should definitely terminate after the Penguins' last game. Of course, there is the long-standing Pittsburgh problem, i.e., if they win the Stanley Cup, people will want to leave them up until at least after the Steelers' first game.


[Reporter's note: the following e-mail is from the mayor's acting press secretary Joanna Doven to Chief of Staff Yarone Zober. It appears to convey a question from a reporter.]

-----Original Message-----
From: Doven, Joanna
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:09 AM
To: Zober, Yarone
Subject: A.Gastmeyer Inquiry

How did the city get around letting the Penguins putting up a huge rally banner at 5th avenue place, with “reebok” all over it? What are the Mayor’s thoughts after the lamar issue?

Joanna Doven
Communications
Mayor Luke Ravenstahl


From: Zober, Yarone
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:13 AM
To: 'David Morehouse'; Mazefsky, Gabe; Shields, Doug
Cc: Baumiller, Lawrence; Specter, George; Ismail, Noor; Tymoczko, Susan
Subject: FW: A.Gastmeyer Inquiry
We’re going to pull the plug on the banner efforts. Even talking to Council has caused the following stories. Sorry for everyone’s time and effort. Maybe something like this could be done outside the City, where people know the value of Pittsburgh Pride over politics. Go Pens!


From: Zober, Yarone
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:32 AM
To: Burgess, Reverend; Shields, Doug; Specter, George; Ismail, Noor; Tymoczko, Susan; Baumiller, Lawrence
Cc: Mazefsky, Gabe
Subject: Thanks for efforts on banners
Ultimately, the City should probably have legislation that provides broader powers to suspend rules for temporary banners in the even of unanticipated good news for Pittsburgh (superbowl wins, Stanley cup, ticker tape parades (?), world series victories. Just kidding about the world series victories). Ultimately, this could have been fun, but not worth it on a fast track with a sensitive issue.

Yarone Zober
Chief of Staff
Office of Mayor Luke Ravenstahl
City of Pittsburgh

Read More...

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Penguins Banners? The "Your Move" E-Mails


E-mails between the Mayor's Chief of Staff, The President of the Pittsburgh Penguins, and the President of City Council shed new light on the banners controversy.

Here's a link to video of my Channel 4 Action News report. The following is an expanded version of the TV story.

With Reebok logos written large, these are the 85 by 40 foot Penguins banners that would have been.

Mayor Luke Ravenstahl is again blaming council, saying opposition there is to blame for the plan falling through:

"Either it was something that they were going to approve or they weren't. To me it was that cut and dry, because of the time associated with it. And we couldn't build that consensus, so it wasn't submitted."


Doug Shields, Council President responds:

"Mr. Peduto and I gave them like three different ways that they would probably get passage of it and that we would support. We made that clear."


Channel 4 Action News artists show here, how the banners could have looked on Fifth Avenue Place, spanning seven stories.

E-mails obtained by Channel 4 Action News show city bureaucrats, not City Council raising red flags about the banners. The following messages were back of a lengthy exchange running from 2 PM to after 10:00 PM last Friday.

The Mayor's Zoning Administrator, Susan Tymoczko:
"Given the amount of advertising copy included, I cannot say that these are approvable".


The Mayor's Planning Director Noor Ismail:
"This has advertising on it and (new) advertising signs are prohibited downtown."


After that, Penguins President David Morehouse e-mailed the mayor's office:

"Just heard from Reebok and they said they are pulling out...
The substantial investment from them is not worth it without their copy."


Morehouse also wrote:

"This is a shame and I can't believe we can't make this work. I am very frustrated with this process."


Shields e-mailed:

"We give permits for all sorts of banners ... We can amend to allow for our sports teams."


Concerning City Council, the mayor's own Chief of Staff Yarone Zober e-mailed at 10 PM Friday:

"It's a go from Council Prez Shields He will confirm by email in the next ten minutes. Good work, everyone."".


Shields e-mailed back:

"To confirm, Mr. Zober. Yes, we will find a way."


At 9:13 AM Tuesday, after news media began asking questions, Zober e-mailed to Penguins:

"We're going to pull the plug on the banner efforts. Even talking to council has caused ... stories."

Zober then e-mailed Council:

"This could have been fun, but not worth it on a fast track with a sensitive issue."

Council Finance Chair Bill Peduto says:

"The Penguins found out that they didn't have Reebok's support in order to produce the banners. So blaming this on council is suspicious at best."



.

Read More...

Monday, May 5, 2008

Reverend Rossi Goes Hollywood


You'll find a link to my Channel 4 Action News report here.

It's about the DVD directed by and starring Reverend Richard Rossi, whose jury deadlocked and did not convict him of attempting to murder his wife in Butler County back in 1994. Rossi later entered a "no contest" plea to a count of aggravated assault in the case, and served a few months in jail.


You can see the trailer for his movie here...


...and his YouTube reel of acting highlights here.


Credit to Steve Levin of the PG for doing the story about Rossi in Sunday's paper; I had spotted the DVD on the shelf at BlockBuster, but not realized it was made by Rossi.

The line in the PG story that stuck in my mind was something also mentioned on the DVD box. The PG reported:

"...It was voted one of the top guerrilla films of all time ..."

It made me want to do some googling to learn more. With the exception of this news release, the only references you'll find on the internet to this organization are in blurbs praising Rossi's movie:

Auteur independent filmmaker Richard Rossi won the top spot on the International Guerrilla Film Association's list of 100 Greatest guerrilla films for his low budget movie "Aimee Semple McPherson," a biopic about a fabled female evangelist in the Roaring Twenties. The results were announced yesterday at the annual IGFA party in New York.

The top five runnerups in order were "Eraserhead," a 1978 David Lynch film, "Night of the Living Dead" (George Romero's horror classic shot in 1968 for $68,000.00), Kevin Smith's $28,000.00 first feature (1994)"Clerks," "400 Blows," a French New Wave film directed by Francois Truffaut in 1959, and "El Mariachi," a 1993 Robert Rodriguez film shot for $7000.00...

...Richard Rossi shot his critically acclaimed movie on a $300.00 consumer camcorder, used clamp-on construction lights purchased at Home Depot for $48.00, and made "Aimee Semple McPherson" under a special Screen Actor's Guild experimental contract for films with budgets under $75,000.00



I can't find the "International Guerrilla Film Association". I did find three groups with similar names.


International Guerrilla Video Festival: its official never heard of Rossi or his movie.


International Guerrilla Film Database: its official never heard of the Sister Aimee movie or writer/director Rossi, either.


• There is an IGFA: it's the International Game Fish Association.

I called the contact number on the news release about the IGFA Top 100. The recording answers for Richard Rossi's production company.

If anyone can provide me with contact information for the International Guerrilla Film Assocation, I'll check it out and mention it here.


In the comments section at Topix, A person named Gina Morton describes seeing this remarkable moment of live theater involving Rossi:


I saw Richard Rossi, the director, writer, and actor in this film portray Elmer Gantry on stage at the Stella Adler Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard a couple years back, and in Long Beach. An amazing performance. The executor of the Richard Brooks estate was in attendance and came up on stage and gave Richard Rossi the Oscar from the 1960 "Elmer Gantry" film and said Richard Brooks would be proud. One of the best nights of theatre in LA ever.


.

Read More...

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Q&A Raw Video: Wecht Jurors Speak Out


The Pittsburgh Channel now has the raw video of the news conference by five jurors from the Wecht trial. Click here to watch.

Here are some quotes from my notes.


Juror Kimberly:

• "I felt strongly that the prosecution did not present a strong enough case that there was a plan or a scheme or intent to defraud."

• "I felt completely devalued, that the time and energy and everything I had put in the trial just flew out the window before we were even dismissed from the room." (On the quick decision by prosecutors to put Wecht on trial a second time.)

• "Now I feel that there definitely could be some political motivations behind what's happening with Doctor Wecht."


Juror Dawn:
• "We all sorted through tons and tons of the evidence, and we just not find any intent to defraud."

• "We truly did try, we went though count by count by count, just went through that barrage of paper, and it just was not there."

• "I feel it's politically motivated. There was a day in testimony where (defense attorney) Mr. McDevitt did not get a word in edgewise, objections just kept coming. And it really made me sit back and think, 'what is it that they're not allowing to come out to us?'"

• "The defense was not able to get a lot of information out to us, a lot of it was stopped, and I just feel that he somewhat sided with the government." (Referring to Judge Schwab.)

• "Just in the end, it was not enough to prove guilt."


Juror Linda:
• "I don't know if politically motivated or not, but it seemed to me that the motivations were certainly less than pure. There was something behind it other than seeking justice." (On the motive of the prosecution.)

• " I felt uncomfortable that the call was made by the FBI, as opposed to somebody directly from the prosecution. I just felt that -- by it's nature -- was intimidating." (On the prosecution's use of FBI agents to contact jurors at home to set up post-trial questioning.)

• "I believe that services were provided in good faith and the county was served in good faith." (On Wecht's work as coroner.)

• "I would do anything that it took if I could have an effect on there not being a future trial. I just feel that it would be punitive -- that there's not a chance that another jury would find differently than we did."


Juror Bruce:
• "With all the witnesses that came forth that had immunity, you would have have thought there'd be somebody that would have dropped a bomb or had the smoking gun."

• "There was no intent for him to defraud the citizens of Allegheny County or his private clients."


Jury Foreman Bob:
• "I'm thinking to myself, geez, you had three years to find somebody and this is the best you could do? I mean, they weren't even upset." (Referring to testimony by the alleged victims among Wecht's private clients.)

• "I definitely feel it's a waste of taxpayer's money. I don't understand how they can find a juror that would convict him, to have twelve people to be unanimous."

• "Definitely politics, now that it's all said and done. Not so much that I thought that during the trial, but especially after you think about how quickly (Assistant U.S. Attorney) Mr. Stallings got up and said we're retrying him, how quickly they had a date set."

• "I was shocked. I was surprised that he would make that decision already without even knowing what the counts (of guilty and not guilty votes by jurors) were."

• "I kind of felt it was a slap in the face. that it was almost like you know, we don't even care what time you put into it or what you thought. It wasn't what we want to hear, so we're doing it again."

• "Drop it and walk away." (His advice to prosecutors.)


.

Read More...

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Billboard Back Story: Brewing Controversies


[Looking for my "Media Debate Blowback" post? Click here.]

There's an intriguing back-story that led up to the peacemaking between Lamar Advertising and Pittsburgh Council members who challenged the legality of their permit to erect an electronic billboard downtown. My Channel 4 Action News report lays out details. I obtained copies of legal filings that reveal a battle of subpoenas and discovery motions, averted just in time.

Here's the text of my TV story.

If this agreement on the Lamar electronic billboard going back through channels hadn't been reached, legal documents show council members were pressing for testimony under subpoena by:

• city URA Executive Director Pat Ford, who struck the deal,
• his Lamar executive best friend Jim Vlasach, with whom he negotiated.
• and Mayor Ravenstahl's Executive Secretary Yarone Zober.
That won't happen now. But the State Ethics Commission is still reviewing gifts received by Ford and Ford's wife -- Mayor Ravenstahl's former press secretary Alecia Sirk -- from Vlasach. Mayor Luke Ravenstahl: "This process in the infancy stages and we'll see where it goes. I'm not concerned about that at this point, and welcome the investigation at the state ethics commission and look forward to their findings."
Legal documents show council members were asking the zoning board to subpoena all records -- quote--

"pertaining to gifts, remuneration, or 'in kind' services provided by Lamar to any official or employee of the City of Pittsburgh..."
The basis?
• The documents say -- quote-- "Mayor Ravenstahl, Mr. Ford, and Mr. Vlasach are all believed to be personal friends."
• The discovery was targeted to -- quote -- "consider whether Lamar applied improper influence to these public officials with respect to the led application approval".
Work on the Lamar electronic billboard is stopped until it clears the normal planning and zoning public process. Meanwhile, published reports [by the PG's Rich Lord] say two different, out-of-town companies also got approval for billboards through Ford without the normal approval process. Mayor Ravenstahl confirms he stopped by Ford's dinner meeting with those execs.
Ravenstahl: "To say hello."
Q: "You just said 'hi' and left?"
A: "No, I mean we just communicated and Pat mentioned that they were in town and I went up to say hello, just like I talk with anybody that's interested in doing business with Pittsburgh. "
Two Oregon-based Liberty Pacific media execs at that dinner meeting later contributed a total of $25,000 to Ravenstahl's campaign.
Q: "Any campaign aspects discussed in the meeting?"
Mayor Ravenstahl: "No."
Q: "Did those donations in any way influence how the their billboards got approved?"
A: "No. I had nothing to do with the approval of the billboards."


.

Read More...

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

City Government Shakeup

Alecia Sirk and Pat Ford

UPDATE: Video.

T
he breaking news tonight is a shakeup in city government involving a power couple in Mayor Luke Ravenstahl's administration.

Here's the text of my live report on Channel 4 Action News at 5:30 PM. The Pittsburgh Channel now has the video online.

City URA Executive Director Pat Ford is part of Mayor Ravenstahl's inner circle and has held a variety of top posts. His wife Alicia Sirk is the mayor's press secretary. They say their friendship with the Lamar advertising executive goes back some time and has nothing to do with the billboard deal.

But the Mayor's chief of staff has just informed us that Alecia Sirk resigned today.
It's in relation to the issues in the story you are about to see..

The URA's Pat Ford has requested a temporary paid leave of absence -- granted, effective immediately -- to allow a review by the appropriate agencies into the gift matters in the report you're going to see now.

[Video]

This is city official Pat Ford -- who struck the deal that bypassed Pittsburgh's permit process to allow Lamar Advertising to put up an electronic billboard on the Grant Street Transportation Center now being built.

His wife Alecia Sirk -- Mayor Ravenstahl's press secretary -- blogged about the couple's friendship with Lamar executive Jim Vlasach a couple of years back.

She calls her husband 'our hero'.., and wrote JV -- that's the Lamar exec -- had gifted her with a sound system.



• "...The best part was that i got a christmas gift! jv brought me surround sound for my dvd player!"

"it is like knock you over one of the best things evah."

Local political blogs The Burgh Report and The Pittsburgh Comet got a tip about it, even though the original files are no longer on the net.

Blogger Bram Reichbaum: "we feel that the appearance of an impropriety is clear. There's certainly enough out there for a perception of impropriety. That's not for us to determine."

Ford is not available for comment, but told our news partner, the Tribune-Review:

• "The gifts ... are of nominal value."

• "I've been in public service long enough now to know what's appropriate and what's inappropriate behavior."

• ".. I also am professional enough and mature enough to know when to separate business with a friendship."


Sirk isn't available for comment today, but she told Blogger Bram Reichbaum that "she didn't regard anything that she had written about in her blog as inappropriate and there was nothing inappropriate about the relationship."


[Back on camera]

The mayor's chief of staff Yarone Zober says the State Ethics commission will review the controversy.

Published reports quote Ford as confirming repeated gifts from his friend,including cigars, ties, and other gifts, which he says are of nominal value.
The Lamar executive did not return our call for comment.
Lamar is suing city council members who are challenging the done deal.
Reporting live, Bob Mayo, Channel 4 Action News.



Later this evening, Joanna Doven of the mayor's office issued this news release:

MAYOR ANNOUNCES PERSONNEL CHANGES


(PITTSBURGH) April 9, 2008 Mayor Luke Ravenstahl announced today a series of personnel developments.

The Mayor has accepted the resignation of press secretary, Alecia Sirk, effective immediately.

Additionally, and in response to a series of media announcements today, Pat Ford, executive director of the Urban Redevelopment Authority, has asked for and been granted a leave of absence. Mr. Ford has further requested a full review of the issues raised relative to the exchange of gifts by the appropriate agencies.

Mr. Ford’s board seat on the Housing Authority will be filled by Fred Frank.

For additional information related to these personnel developments, please call Yarone Zober at [phone number]. All other media inquires are to be directed to Joanna Doven.

Read More...

Mistrial Day Zero: The Wecht Trial Reloaded


Welcome to any readers following my Pittsburgh Channel blogging of the Wecht trial who are new to my personal blog.

The mistrial brought an end to 35 working trial days...ten weeks in court...including 53 hours of deliberations over the course of three of those weeks. There are blog entries listed day by day at this link. The Pittsburgh Channel has video of my WTAE Channel 4 Action News report, as well some raw video of Wecht's defense team.

Here are some quotes from Dr. Cyril Wecht and his attorneys made following the mistrial declaration.


Dr. Cyril Wecht:

• "The toll on my family has been horrendous."
• "We've been living under this cloud for all that time. The emotional drain has been absolutely unbelievable."
• "...the drain emotionally, personally, professionally and financially.."

• "How much I have been hurt, I'm sure that what I know of represents the tip of the iceberg, because most people are not going to call you and say I was going to consult you, but I can't."

• "We are going to continue to do whatever is necessary. I don't say that in a bold fashion with braggadocio. I'm just telling you what has to be done will be done."

• "If I have to spend the rest of my years, then so will it be."

• "We know where we're going and we know what we have to do. And we know where truth lies and we know where justice resides, and I'm sure that we shall reach those objectives."

• "We recognize what the ideology as well as the continuing pathogenesis of this sordid saga is, and there's nothing to be happy or comforted about."


Former U.S. Attorney General Dick Thornburgh, member of the Wecht legal team:

• "A nickle-dime prosecution when there is rampant crime, terrorism, other kinds of threats that affect the American people."

• "These charges clearly were not worthy of being brought in a federal criminal court."

• "The government has utterly failed to prove their case. And it's time in my view for these charges to be dismissed and for Dr. Wecht to be able to get on with his life."

• "The allegations of political influence in this case, about which I testified before the United States Congress -- the judge prohibited any inquiry into that in the course of this case."




Jerry McDevitt, Wecht defense attorney:

• "I thought what happened in that courtroom today was an utter disgrace. On every level, no matter how your measure it, it was one of the most bizarre endings to one of the most unfair trials ever conducted in Pittsburgh history."

• "To announce a retrial of Cyril Wecht this quickly was designed to make sure he would not have one day of respite from what has become a vindictive prosecution. Everybody in Pittsburgh knows it now."

• " 'Get ready for this again, Doctor Wecht.'  That is vindictive, that is mean spirited, and that is against everything United States attorneys in this country are supposed to be about."

• "It's hard to beat people that won't quit. We're not going to quit. Period. They didn't beat us this time. This makes us want to beat them even more the next time."

• "I think a federal judge ought to read the constitution, not cookie recipes.  Period."

• "Plying jurors with cookies and stuff like was done in this case. It's just one of the many, many irregularities that accompanied this trial, but sometimes I felt like I was at Sara Lee's Bakery, rather than a federal courtroom."



U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan (written statement):

• "We are committed to eliminating the culture of corruption that prevails when officials at the highest levels abuse the public trust. Allegations of wrongdoing by public officials can be both challenging to investigate and to prove. A deadlocked jury means only that the jury was unable to reach a unanimous decision on the charges presented. The government bears the burden of proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of every count charged."


.

Read More...

Monday, March 24, 2008

Claws Of Fury... or About Those Scratches


This is Sky -- our wild and beautiful free-spirited cat. As you can see in this photo, he also has his sweet, gentle, contemplative moments.

Sky is deaf, but that hasn't stopped him from becoming the cheerful Top Cat here: he's fearless, ever-curious, always ready to play.

He loves to be carried around our home, tummy up, blissfully watching the world go by upside down.

Except when he doesn't.

He abruptly changed his mind on this matter Sunday evening as I was carrying him. Of course, the quickest way to right himself in a flash and escape was to push off hard with his back paws.

Looking for traction to launch himself down to the floor, kicking his legs, he found it. On my face.

Some of the more keen-eyed among you may notice on TV what is obvious if you see me in person: several scratches across my left jaw. One of them was bad enough to require a few stitches.

The scratches and sewing aren't very telegenic...but I figure if Charlie Rose can press on (see the story below), so can I.

Read More...

Friday, March 14, 2008

What A Difference A Day Makes: Ravenstahl Clinton Endorsement?


UPDATE # 3: e-mailed at 11:46 AM. The message is re-sent, this time from Sirk's personal Yahoo e-mail account. The previous message was from her City of Pittsburgh e-mail account. The final version is the same quote from Mayor Ravenstahl, prefaced with the headline "LUKE RAVENSTAHL: PITTSBURGH'S MAYOR. OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF ENDORSEMENT FOR SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES".

UPDATE # 2: e-mailed at 11:16 AM:

Sirk, Alecia would like to recall the message, ""

UPDATE: The following statement from Mayor Ravenstahl was e-mailed by his press secretary Alecia Sirk at 11:12 AM today:

“I am pleased to have the opportunity this afternoon to voice my support for Sen. Hillary Clinton as the next president of the United States,” Ravenstahl said. “In one of her speeches, Sen. Clinton said something that had particular meaning for me: she said ‘wait a minute, Wall Street; you’ve had your president. Now we need a president for Main Street.’

“That statement reflects my approach to government: putting neighborhoods first, bolstering job opportunities, ensuring that residents can thrive and grow families in Pittsburgh and other cities like ours. With Sen. Clinton in the White House we will have a partner in the White House who will champion programs that will help Pittsburgh thrive.”


When I asked, Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl insisted repeatedly during a news conference Tuesday that he had not decided between Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama. Within hours, Clinton campaign sources were widely quoted as saying that in fact Ravenstahl will be endorsing Senator Clinton today.

You can watch the raw video from WTAE Channel 4 Action News on The Pittsburgh Channel website. Click here to open it in a new window. I'm also posting some of my questions and the mayor's answers below. The video also includes City Controller Michael Lamb's endorsement of Senator Obama.


Q: In your role as a super delegate, do you anticipate, have you made a decision on which candidate you're backing? If not, to you anticipate doing that prior to primary day? Why or why not?

A: I have not made a decision. I can tell you that I don't know if I'm a super delegate. I know that Rich (Lord of the Post-Gazette) reported as much. As a result of that, we've had some back and forth, and I don't know if I'm a pledged delegate or a super delegate, so I don't want to be -- I guess I don't want to say that I'm a super delegate. But I can tell you just generally, overall with the race, you know, I haven't made a decision yet. I'm in the process of having discussions with both campaigns and we'll go from there. I do anticipate making an endorsement at some point in time. When that will be, I'm not sure yet. But I think it's important for the mayor the city to make an endorsement at some point, and when I make a decision I'll make sure you guys are the first to know.

Q (from a second reporter): Will you be making the rounds with Senator Clinton tomorrow and Saturday?

A: You know, I don't even know what that means at this point. I don't know what the rounds are. I know she's going to be in town, but other than that I don't have any specific information. So, as of now, I don't know but I'm not planning on it at this point. It depends on what the specifics are and I don't have any of them at this point.

Q (from the second reporter): Has she talked to you recently about supporting her?

A: Not personally she hasn't, no. I talked to the president last week and Senator Obama this week and their campaigns respectively but I haven't directly spoken with her.

Q: Have you directly spoken with Obama, you said?

A: Yes I did.

Q: And what -- tell us about that conversation.

A: Just very vanilla. Obviously asking for support, and just looked forward to being in Pittsburgh and meeting me and, you know, spending some time in the state and the city.

[...later in the news conference...]

Q: Some people presume that Hillary Clinton would have the inside track for getting your support; is that not the case?

A: You guys are all speculators. I don't -- again, I like them both. It's a very difficult situation to be in. I think Democrats across the country are struggling with this. We've seen that when Senator Clinton got ahead, then all of a sudden here comes Senator Obama, and vice versa. So I think it's good healthy dialog and debate for the Democrats because we understand as a party, I think, what I just illustrated: that we need a change in this country and I think that's what you've seen happen over the course of time and certainly will happen in Pennsylvania over the next six weeks.

[...still later in the news conference, on the topic of whether he is a super delegate...]

A: "...in my discussions with the county executive, he suggested I was not a super -- I don't know what you reported, but his understanding of what you reported was not accurate. Now, I don't know what that means, I don't know -- I haven't talked directly to the state party. So, I think I am some form of a delegate, but I don't know that I'm a super delegate to speak my mind as I see fit.

Q (from a third reporter): I wasn't told you were a super delegate, but a PLEO, which is something different.

A: The distinction that he suggested -- and I didn't get a chance to read the e-mail from the state party -- but was that I was not free, necessarily, to speak my mind as I see fit. So, I'm pledged, in that I may have to, you know, whatever the state does or the city does, have to go that way. So I don't know that I'm free to speak my mind, is I guess the caveat that's different than perhaps what was reported. But I'll try to find out today, if I can.


.

Read More...

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Parking Tax: Orie Warns of Penalties


State Senate Majority Whip Jane Orie says she's preparing a letter to Pittsburgh's oversight board, asking it to warn City Council: by freezing the parking tax rate, council risks a cutoff of all state funds to the city. The ability to impose that penalty is one of the powers granted to the oversight board by state lawmakers. Pittsburgh's financial recovery plan approved by the Pennsylvania legislature requires that the parking tax be scaled back. That was part of the trade-off in exchange for additional taxing powers granted to the city, including the annual $52 emergency municipal services tax.

Councilman Jim Motznik, the sponsor of the legislation, had hoped that council's passing of the freeze would provide the basis for a conversation with state lawmakers in Harrisburg next week. Orie's reaction does not bode well for that conversation.

Motznik argues that parking lot and garage operators did not pass along this year's parking tax cut to consumers. His bill would lock in this year's parking tax rate at 45 percent instead of lowering it to 40 percent for 2008. His legislation dedicates revenues from the five percent difference to making payments on the city's debt and pension fund obligations. [PG & Trib coverage of the issue.]

You can watch video of my Channel 4 Action News report on the Pittsburgh Channel.

Here are some key quotes from my interviews with Orie and Motznik. They were conducted separately on Tuesday.



Orie:

• "It violates the spirit and letter of the law. It's in complete violation of the state law. This was negotiated in a bi-partisan fashion."

• "Right now,what Councilman Motznik is doing is a back door tax on the backs of the commuters."

• "It's irresponsible for them to have passed this. I believe there is no support in the legislature to do this."

• "There are ramifications for violating the law, and they could lose state moneys. That alerts them them, you are taking an action in violation, this is what is at risk."

• "Under state law, if they want to play this game---and it's really sad, because they're violating the letter of the law--not only can the state withhold funding. The state, because it's a state created city parking authority, we can force them to reduce the rates."


Motznik:

• "I don't feel that it's illegal. We here on council control old taxes, new taxes, what tax rates are going to be."

• "I think it helps the cause in Harrisburg, because it shows that we're being fiscally responsible with the funds that we would have lost."

• "It gives us a few months to take something to Harrisburg and try to work out an agreement."

• "Worst case scenario, we don't agree, then we're headed for probably some legal problems. But the idea is not to fight with the legislature."


.

Read More...